Whilst covering a dance-based fashion show recently, I decided to whip out my infrared camera and take a few dozen shots. It all worked out better than I expected. The camera was particularly partial to dancers bathed in red artificial light - something that my visible-light camera has little appreciation for. See the flickr set for more of this sort of thing.
Tuesday, 8 March 2011
Wednesday, 2 March 2011
Infrared-converted Canon 400D: First Impressions
I recently became the proud owner of an infrared-converted Canon EOS 400D. Here are some first impressions:
Sensitivity: As you'd expect from an IR-conversion, the camera is very sensitive to infrared. Exposure time is pretty close to normal photography.
Auto exposure: Exposure is consistently off by about 1 stop, which can be easily corrected using exposure compensation. Dynamic range appears less than for visible-light photography, so highlights are unlikely to be clipped when using auto exposure (assuming RAW-mode).
Resolution: Since green and blue sensors are fairly insensitive to infrared, most detail in infrared photography comes from the red channel - reducing resolution by a third or so. Nevertheless, there seems to be plenty of detail in the images I captured, at least when compared to the Ricoh GX100 I was using previously.
White Balance: As is normal for infrared photography, use of auto exposure results in very red images. Custom white balance works well, leading to largely greyscale images.
Lenses: Canon 50mm f/1.8 and Canon 100mm f/2.8 both work well, with no hotspots. Sigma's 30mm f/1.4 also gives nice images, although does produce very mild hotspots for some apertures. I'll be giving these, and other lenses, a more thorough seeing to in the (hopefully) near future.
Below are some sample images:
Sensitivity: As you'd expect from an IR-conversion, the camera is very sensitive to infrared. Exposure time is pretty close to normal photography.
Auto exposure: Exposure is consistently off by about 1 stop, which can be easily corrected using exposure compensation. Dynamic range appears less than for visible-light photography, so highlights are unlikely to be clipped when using auto exposure (assuming RAW-mode).
Resolution: Since green and blue sensors are fairly insensitive to infrared, most detail in infrared photography comes from the red channel - reducing resolution by a third or so. Nevertheless, there seems to be plenty of detail in the images I captured, at least when compared to the Ricoh GX100 I was using previously.
White Balance: As is normal for infrared photography, use of auto exposure results in very red images. Custom white balance works well, leading to largely greyscale images.
Lenses: Canon 50mm f/1.8 and Canon 100mm f/2.8 both work well, with no hotspots. Sigma's 30mm f/1.4 also gives nice images, although does produce very mild hotspots for some apertures. I'll be giving these, and other lenses, a more thorough seeing to in the (hopefully) near future.
Below are some sample images:
![]() |
Sigma 30mm @ f7.1 |
![]() |
Sigma 30mm @ f2 |
![]() |
Canon 50mm @ f/2.5 |
Tuesday, 1 March 2011
Ricoh Caplio GX100
![]() |
Who needs an HA-2 adapter when you have a kitchen roll? |
The GX100 is a high-end compact with a built in zoom lens. The compact-sized sensor means that selective focus will always remain a distant dream, but the lens is very sharp and produces great images for a compact camera. Images can be saved in raw format, which is a real boon for infrared photography. Filters can be fitted using the optional HA-2 adapter. As you would expect for small optional plastic bits, this is somewhat over-priced. If you fancy something cheaper, I found the cardboard tube from a kitchen role to be a quite capable replacement when I first bought the camera.
![]() |
Unprocessed, auto white balance |
![]() |
Unprocessed, custom white balance |
![]() |
Red and blue layers swapped |
The GX100 can produce some pretty decent infrared images with minimal post-processing. Some examples images are shown on the left.
With auto white balance, the raw images have a deeply red tint (see top image). This can be removed in post-processing, but it is easier and generally more effective to set a custom white balance before shooting.
False colour does not usually appear in the Ricoh's unprocessed images, but a slightly-off custom white balance can lead to some interesting tonality. The second image, for example, was taken using a custom white balance set several hours previously.
The final image shows the effect of swapping the red and blue layers in the GIMP, followed by a little levels adjustment to improve contrast.
For more examples, see this Flickr set.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)